In the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) process, the core task of Embedding is to convert large amounts of text data processed by the Parser, such as documents and knowledge base content, into numerical forms that computers can understand and compare - vectors.
This conversion process enables the RAG system to:
1. Understand Semantics
Embedding models capture the deep semantic meaning of text, not just surface vocabulary. This means that even if the wording in queries and documents differs, the system can identify their relevance as long as the semantics are similar.
2. Efficient Retrieval
After converting text to vectors, the system can use efficient vector similarity search algorithms to quickly find the most relevant text segments from massive databases.
3. Improve Generation Quality
Retrieved relevant text segments are provided to Large Language Models (LLMs) as contextual references, helping LLMs generate more accurate responses.
Embedding Plays Two Key Roles in MaiAgent's RAG Technology
1. Convert knowledge base content into vectors and store them in vector databases
2. Vectorize user questions to compare similarity with vectors in the database to find the most relevant content
RAG Process
Simply put, Embedding is the cornerstone of RAG systems, transforming unstructured text data into computable and comparable vectors, which is a key prerequisite for achieving precise information retrieval and high-quality content generation.
Impact of Embedding on RAG Systems
1. Retrieval Quality
Semantic Understanding Depth: High-quality embedding models can more accurately capture the semantic content of text, improving retrieval relevance
Context Awareness: Excellent embeddings can understand textual context relationships, ensuring retrieval result coherence
Retrieval Speed: The vector dimensions and computational efficiency of embedding models directly affect retrieval response time
Resource Consumption: Different embedding models have varying computational resource requirements, affecting system scalability
Parallel Processing: Efficient embedding models can support large-scale parallel retrieval
Embedding Models Supported by MaiAgent
Model Name
Model Developer
Origin
Features
Open Source
Deployment Method
MTEB Average Score
Cohere Embed v4.0
Cohere
Canada
Multilingual support, highest performance
No
Requires cloud API inference service
Not yet public
Reference v3.0: 64.47
Cohere Embed Multilingual v3.0 (Bedrock)
Cohere
Canada
Multilingual support, high performance
No
Requires cloud API inference service
64.47
OpenAI text-embedding-3-Large
OpenAI
USA
Multilingual (especially strong in English context), medium performance
No
Requires cloud API inference service
64.68
EmbeddingGemma
Google
USA
Open source, multilingual support, lightweight
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
61.15
Mxbai-embed-large
Mixedbread AI
USA
Open source, good balance of performance and resources; strong in long context
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
64.68
BGE-Large
BAAI
China
Open source, multilingual support, lightweight
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
64.23
Nomic-embed-text
Nomic AI
USA
Open source, lightweight
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
62.39
Qwen3-Embedding 0.6B
Alibaba
China
Open source, lightweight
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
61.82
Granite-embedding-278m-multilingual
IBM
USA
Open source, multilingual, lightweight
Yes
Can be deployed on cloud or local GPU
56.1
To ensure semantic representation accuracy and retrieval precision, MaiAgent's embedding models are selected and evaluated based on MTEB (Massive Text Embedding Benchmark) standards. MTEB is currently the mainstream benchmark for semantic vectorization models, covering various task types including:
Retrieval
Classification
Clustering
Reranking
STS (Semantic Textual Similarity)
Summarization / QA / Pair Classification, etc.
MaiAgent's Embedding Technology Advantages
1. Flexible Model Selection:
Offers multiple embedding model choices to meet different needs
2. Diverse Deployment Options:
Supports both cloud and local deployment to ensure data security
3. Performance Optimization:
Specially optimized for RAG scenarios to provide optimal retrieval results
4. Cost Effectiveness:
Choose appropriate models based on actual needs, balancing performance and cost